[Autonogram] Mid-January Autonomedia report

[Ben at Autonomedia]

Dear Autonogram subscribers --

Here's a mid-January update on some of what's been going on around
Autonomedia.

* * *
1. Critical Art Ensemble: trial update, new book
2. Shut Them Down!: New book on the G8 protests in Scotland
3. 50% off 2006 Autonomedia Jubilee Saints calendars
4. Some highlights from the Interactivist Network
* * *

1. Steve Kurtz (and by extension, the Critical Art Ensemble) was denied a
motion to dismiss his trial last week in Federal court. Critical Art
Ensemble are the collective authors of a series of Autonomedia books
analyzing the authoritarian uses of science and technology, particularly
where these mechanisms operate with a positive, "everyone's a winner" face
(the full-stomached promises of food genomics, for example, or the
healthy-and-smart-kids promises of the reproductive industries). Not
content to be armchair critics, the CAE also produce art and performance
that brings their analysis to museum and gallery audiences and into the
public sphere, demystifying the spectacle of what they've called the
"military techno-security cineplex."

Of course, this got Steve in big trouble with the security-happy
administration, and for close to two years now he's been under
investigation for an artwork found in his home at the time of his wife's
death. The absurdities of the case seem apparent to nearly everyone except
the court itself, which insists on draining everyone's resources to pin a
mail-fraud charge on him.

There is good news, though. Despite these many months of strain and
stress, CAE has another book in the pipes, scheduled to be published in
the early Spring of this year. It's called "Plague March", and rips apart
the fear economy at the foundation of bio-warfare alarmism. That's all
I'll say about it just now, except that one of the appendices to the book
comes from Claire Pentecost, of the CAE Defense Fund, analyzing the real
reasons the State has chosen to prosecute Steve's case. This text is well
worth reading online at our Interactivist site, at the following address:
http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=05/05/30/2348202

Also, please read the forwarded email at the bottom of this Autonogram,
from Lucia Sommer of the Defense Fund, and check their website from time
to time: http://www.caedefensefund.org

* *

Autonomedia has recently collaborated with the Dissent Network in the UK
to produce "Shut Them Down! The G8, Gleneagles 2005, and the Movement of
Movements", a new collection that takes as its starting point the protests
in Scotland last summer. Not content to just rehash what went on there,
the book addresses issues fundamental to the globalized resistance to
capital, such as the nature of openness and "horizontality" and
limitations of the "activist" identity. More on the book, including a
table of contents and list of contributors, is at
http://www.shutthemdown.org, and you can order the book from our new
online bookstore at
http://bookstore.autonomedia.org/index.php?main_page=pubs_product_book_info&products_id=473
We'll be shipping these books as soon as they're received from the UK.

* *

50% off Saints calendars! Another tradition of mid-January around here
(aside from hot buttered rum-soaked toboggan races across the East River
with Team Autonomedia) is trying to sell off the remaining Calendars of
Jubilee Saints still in our inventory. $4.98 gets you a fresh copy at
http://bookstore.autonomedia.org/index.php?main_page=pubs_product_book_info&cPath=5&products_id=469
.

* *

Interactivist Info Exchange: Recent Headlines

Please make a regular visit to our online Interactivist Info Exchange.
Read a story, leave a comment, engage, debate, illuminate! Here are some
recent hotties:

http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=06/01/17/2225239 is a recent
interview with Italian Autonomia philosopher/agitator Paolo Virno,
discussing his history, immaterial labor, etc. (and
http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=05/12/27/0513241 for Steve
Wright's discussion on some of the same)

http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=06/01/07/1727205 on the
recent death of Zapatista Comandante Ramona (and
http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=06/01/03/1459209 for Marcos'
transition to Candidate Zero)

http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=05/12/13/1414210 for an
analysis of Chomsky's anarchism.

http://info.interactivist.net/article.pl?sid=06/01/03/199257 for efforts
by WalMart employees in Florida to use collective action and mutual aid to
deal with problems on and off the shop floor.

* * *
that's it, and please feel free to change your subscription options using
the links at the bottom of this email. And please read the following! It's
important!

bests,
Ben / Autonomedia

*

-PLEASE FORWARD WIDELY-


January 17, 2006


Dear supporters of Steve Kurtz and Critical Art Ensemble,


Your support is needed now more than ever.

Whereas the hopes for dismissal of Steve’s case were high last fall, on
Thursday we received bad news on the recommendation concerning the
pre-trial motions. Although it has been over 18 months since Steve was
charged with “mail fraud” and “wire fraud”—charges carrying a maximum
possible sentence of 20 years in jail—he will now have to wait at least 8
months, and possibly much longer, for the final decision on these motions.
(Please see http://www.caedefensefund.org for more about the case.)

Magistrate H. Kenneth Schroeder recommended that all our motions for
dismissal of the case and suppression of evidence be denied, with one
exception: there will be a hearing on the suppression of statements made
while Steve was illegally detained. (Schroeder’s recommendations also
include a footnote stating that since Steve’s co-defendant Robert Ferrell
is gravely ill at this point, Ferrell’s case is being held in dormancy.)

Magistrate Schroeder's recommendations will next go to the Federal
District Court to be heard by Judge John T. Elfvin, who will make the
final ruling on the pre-trial motions, thereby determining whether or not
the case will go to trial. If the motions are denied by Elfvin, Steve can
choose to appeal to the next higher federal court, or go directly to
trial.

LEGAL DETAILS AND TIMELINE

Schroeder’s recommendation cited legal precedent that “An indictment
returned by a legally constituted and unbiased grand jury
 if valid on its
face, is enough to call for trial of the charge” [even if] “the grand jury
acted on the basis of inadequate or incompetent evidence.” (Please see
http://www.caedefensefund.org/announcements/order1.12.06.pdf for the full
text of the recommendation.) In other words, once the legal machine is
turned on, it is very difficult to turn off. Therefore, supporters should
prepare for the likelihood that Steve’s case will go to trial.

Within the next 10 days Steve’s lawyer, Paul Cambria, will file an appeal
of Schroeder's recommendations. Steve’s lawyers will then get a hearing
for their appeal of all of Schroeder’s recommendations in Judge Elfvin's
court. There, Cambria will make essentially all the same arguments as at
the hearing last spring before Schroeder. (For the press release detailing
those arguments and more information about the case, please see
http://www.caedefensefund.org/releases/051705_Release.html) This appeal
hearing will probably happen in mid-summer of 2006. We will then have to
wait once again for Elfvin’s final ruling on all the motions for dismissal
and suppression.

(There is no date for the other hearing, on the suppression of statements,
but it will happen sometime within the next 60 days.)

SUPPORT NEEDED MORE THAN EVER

Although any actual trial is still far off, your continued support has
made, and continues to make, all the difference in this case. Without your
support, Steve would probably be in jail now awaiting trial. As we know,
justice in politically motivated trials is won in the court of public
opinion as much as in the court of law.

Because of your support, we have raised the more than $200,000 necessary
for Steve and Robert Ferrell’s defense. Due to the overwhelming success of
this fundraising effort, there are 3 main forms of support that we now
need:

1) Publicizing this precedent-setting case and its implications for
artists, intellectuals, researchers
and others—particularly in outlets that will reach the Buffalo population.
In this regard, we are still
hoping for a real investigative story into the DoJ’s and prosecuting
District Attorney William Hochul’s motivations in this case. Anyone who is
interested or knows such a journalist—particularly one who could spend
some time in the Buffalo area—is encouraged to
contact the Defense Fund at: media (at) caedefensefund.org

2) Publicizing this case wherever possible. Anyone interested in helping
to publicize this case through creative means at the College Art
Association Annual Conference (February 22-25 in Boston) please contact
the Defense Fund at: media (at) caedefensefund.org

3) At the time of the actual trial, should one occur, helping to mobilize
support for a massive
demonstration in Buffalo, NY.

Thank you once again for your continued support.


In solidarity,

The CAE Defense Fund
media @ caedefensefund.org